
doi: 10.1111/biom.12434
pmid: 26574904
SummaryOften the object of inference in biomedical applications is a range that brackets a given fraction of individual observations in a population. A classical estimate of this range for univariate measurements is a “tolerance interval.” This article develops its natural extension for functional measurements, a “tolerance band,” and proposes a methodology for constructing its pointwise and simultaneous versions that incorporates both sparse and dense functional data. Assuming that the measurements are observed with noise, the methodology uses functional principal component analysis in a mixed model framework to represent the measurements and employs bootstrapping to approximate the tolerance factors needed for the bands. The proposed bands also account for uncertainty in the principal components decomposition. Simulations show that the methodology has, generally, acceptable performance unless the data are quite sparse and unbalanced, in which case the bands may be somewhat liberal. The methodology is illustrated using two real datasets, a sparse dataset involving CD4 cell counts and a dense dataset involving core body temperatures.
Parametric tolerance and confidence regions, Principal Component Analysis, Karhunen-Loéve expansion, Models, Statistical, mixed model, Factor analysis and principal components; correspondence analysis, tolerance interval, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, Body Temperature, CD4 Lymphocyte Count, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Confidence Intervals, Humans, Computer Simulation, bootstrap, functional data analysis
Parametric tolerance and confidence regions, Principal Component Analysis, Karhunen-Loéve expansion, Models, Statistical, mixed model, Factor analysis and principal components; correspondence analysis, tolerance interval, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, Body Temperature, CD4 Lymphocyte Count, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Confidence Intervals, Humans, Computer Simulation, bootstrap, functional data analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
