
doi: 10.1111/avsc.12119
handle: 10459.1/57663
AbstractQuestionsHumans are altering land use and impacting grazing intensities worldwide in alpine and sub‐alpine grasslands, and functional diversity (FD) is a useful tool for predicting changes in these grassland communities and for improving biodiversity conservation. We asked: (1) how does functional richness (FRic) differ between the five predominant grassland types in Andorra (2) of these five grassland types, which plant communities are subject to high habitat filtering and which are driven primarily by competitive interactions; (3) are certain grassland communities more prone to degradation than others; and (4) how do grazing intensity and elevation influence variations inFDindices?LocationsFive types of sub‐alpine and alpine grassland communities dominated byFestuca airoides,F. eskia,F. gautieri,F. paniculataandNardus strictain Andorra, at various elevations and with differing grazing intensities within a grassland type.MethodsWe used multiple functional diversity indices and structural equation modelling (SEM) to determine how grazing intensity, elevation, species richness and productivity affect functional diversity in 222 vegetation transects.ResultsBoth plant diversity and functional richness were higher at higher grazing intensities, with the highest values found in theF. gautieriandF. paniculatagrasslands and lowest in theNardus stricta,F. airoidesandF. eskiagrasslands. Habitat filtering was observed inF. airoidesgrasslands. There was a general tendency for higher competitive interactions among plants at higher elevations and/or when species diversity increased. None of the five grassland communities considered appears disturbed, and all present similar functional attributes between dominant species.ConclusionsOur results highlight the fact that grazing is an integral part of Andorran mountain grasslands, acting as a structural component and providing higher functional richness in the most grazed communities.
Grazing, Pastures, Pasturatge
Grazing, Pastures, Pasturatge
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 28 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
