
doi: 10.1111/avj.12643
pmid: 29076220
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to identify factors affecting colostrum quality in dairy cattle.MethodsColostrum samples were collected from lactating dairy cows (n = 990) from nine commercial dairy herds in south‐west Victoria. Colostrum quality was measured using an optical Brix refractometer. Cow‐level factors thought to influence colostrum quality included season of calving, dam breed and age, volume of first‐milking colostrum produced and whether the dam leaked colostrum prior to calving. Multivariable logistic regression was used to quantify the association between each cow‐level factor and whether or not colostrum was assessed to be of poor quality.ResultsCows older than 5 years of age were less likely to have poor‐quality colostrum compared with primiparous heifers (odds ratio (OR) 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11–0.89, P = 0.009). The odds of having poor‐quality colostrum was increased in cows and primiparous heifers that leaked colostrum prior to calving (OR 2.06, 95% CI, 1.33–3.17, P = 0.001). Cows and primiparous heifers that produced ≥ 8.5 L of colostrum were 1.76 times as likely to have poor‐quality colostrum as individuals that produced < 8.5 L (95% CI, 1.10–2.82, P = 0.018). Visual assessment of colostrum by the herd manager was moderately correlated with colostrum quality, with 69% of poor‐quality samples being correctly classified.ConclusionAlthough this study identified factors that increase the risk of poor‐quality colostrum, we concluded that objective assessment using a Brix refractometer is a more reliable means of assessing colostrum quality.
Victoria, Colostrum, Dairying, Refractometry, Logistic Models, Pregnancy, Immunoglobulin G, Animals, Lactation, Cattle, Female
Victoria, Colostrum, Dairying, Refractometry, Logistic Models, Pregnancy, Immunoglobulin G, Animals, Lactation, Cattle, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
