International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer – An ISUP consensus on contemporary grading
Copyright policy )International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer – An ISUP consensus on contemporary grading
The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) has issued guidelines for the grading of prostate cancer based on a consensus conference held in 2014. The recommendations resulting from the 2014 consensus conference were a further development of 2005 ISUP modified Gleason grading. In the 2014 system, morphological criteria are clarified, including updated definitions of Gleason pattern 4. In addition to the continued reporting of Gleason scores, we also recommend that Gleason scores ≤6, 3 + 4 = 7, 4 + 3 = 7, 8 and 9–10, respectively, be reported as five groups, i.e. ISUP grades 1–5. This new grading system has the dual benefit of predicting patient outcome as well as facilitating patient communication.
- University of Queensland Australia
- Karolinska Institute Sweden
- University of Otago New Zealand
- McMaster University Canada
- University of Queensland Australia
Gleason grade, Male, Societies, Scientific, Prostate cancer, Prostatic Neoplasms, Guidelines as Topic, ISUP grade, 2726 Microbiology (medical), Consensus Statements as Topic, 2734 Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Grading, 2723 Immunology and Allergy, Humans, Neoplasm Grading
Gleason grade, Male, Societies, Scientific, Prostate cancer, Prostatic Neoplasms, Guidelines as Topic, ISUP grade, 2726 Microbiology (medical), Consensus Statements as Topic, 2734 Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Grading, 2723 Immunology and Allergy, Humans, Neoplasm Grading
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).201 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!