
doi: 10.1111/aogs.13294
pmid: 29338067
AbstractIntroductionThe purpose of the present study was to compare the levels of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF‐α), and interleukins (IL) 1, 6, 8 and 10 in the umbilical cord and neonatal circulation among neonates with early and late cord clamping.Material and methodsA consecutive series of 76 cases of uncomplicated pregnancy and an uneventful parturition was evaluated. In 40 cases, delayed cord clamping was used and in the remaining 36, early cord clamping was practiced. Blood samples were collected from the umbilical vein immediately after cord clamping and at 24 h from the median cubital or basilic vein of the neonate.ResultsSignificant differences were noted in the hematocrit and hemoglobin levels at 24 h that favored delayed clamping. None of the evaluated markers of inflammation differ between the two groups. Spearman's rho revealed a significant correlation between umbilical cord TNF‐α and TNF‐α neonatal values at 24 h (r = 0.551, p = 0.022) in the early clamped group. Significant correlations were also noted between umbilical cord TNF‐α and TNF‐α neonatal values at 24 h (r = 0.728, p = 0.001), umbilical cord IL‐10 and neonatal IL‐10 at 24 h (r = 0.487, p = 0.047) and umbilical cord IL‐1b and neonatal IL‐1b at 24 h (r = 0.516, p = 0.034).ConclusionsDelayed cord clamping or cord milking does not alter the levels of inflammatory cytokines in cord blood and neonatal serum. Future studies should evaluate the impact of delayed cord clamping in selected high‐risk pregnancies.
Umbilical Veins, Infant, Newborn, Constriction, Umbilical Cord, Perinatal Care, Pregnancy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Cytokines, Humans, Female, Placental Circulation, Biomarkers
Umbilical Veins, Infant, Newborn, Constriction, Umbilical Cord, Perinatal Care, Pregnancy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Cytokines, Humans, Female, Placental Circulation, Biomarkers
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
