
AbstractCesarean hysterectomy is considered the reference standard treatment for placenta accreta. In young women who want the option of future pregnancy and agree to close follow‐up monitoring, conservative treatment is a valid option. Several key points of both cesarean hysterectomy and conservative treatment remain debatable, such as timing of delivery, attempted removal of the placenta, use of temporal internal iliac occlusion balloon catheters, ureteral stents, prophylactic embolization, and methotrexate. In cases of placenta percreta with bladder involvement, conservative treatment may be the optimal management. Regardless of the chosen option, the woman and her partner should be warned of the high risk of maternal complications related to an abnormally invasive placenta.
Adult, Time Factors, Placenta Previa, Obstetric Surgical Procedures, conservative treatment, Placenta Accreta, Hysterectomy, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Bias, abnormally invasive placenta, Risk Factors, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, cesarean hysterectomy, Humans, placenta accrete or percreta, Ligation, Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal, Cesarean Section, Hemostatic Techniques, Postpartum Hemorrhage, Pregnancy Outcome, Fertility Preservation, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Combined Modality Therapy, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Methotrexate, antenatal diagnosis, [SDV.SPEE] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie, Stents, Female, management
Adult, Time Factors, Placenta Previa, Obstetric Surgical Procedures, conservative treatment, Placenta Accreta, Hysterectomy, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Bias, abnormally invasive placenta, Risk Factors, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, cesarean hysterectomy, Humans, placenta accrete or percreta, Ligation, Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal, Cesarean Section, Hemostatic Techniques, Postpartum Hemorrhage, Pregnancy Outcome, Fertility Preservation, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Combined Modality Therapy, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Methotrexate, antenatal diagnosis, [SDV.SPEE] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie, Stents, Female, management
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 159 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
