Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Boundary Conditions for the Industrial Production of LFC Cells

Authors: Grohe, Andreas; Fleischhauer, B.; Preu, Ralf; Glunz, Stefan W.; Willeke, Gerhard;

Boundary Conditions for the Industrial Production of LFC Cells

Abstract

The `Laser-Fired Contact' (LFC) process scheme developed at Fraunhofer ISE is a fast, easy applicable and industrially feasible way of introducing the `Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell' (PERC) structure into solar cell production. Because the standard industrial production scheme needs to be adapted to the LFC process several further aspects have to be taken into account. It is already well known that thermal influence like an annealing step is beneficial for some dielectric layers as well as for LFC. Therefore experiments have been carried out to investigate the influence of temperature, duration and ambient atmosphere of a final annealing step on the performance of LFC rear sides. Results showed that in contrast to the standard ISE clean room process the solar cell efficiencies did not deteriorate by using a low-cost and contaminated metal belt furnace instead of a clean quartz tube. Additionally not even the forming gas ambient was necessary enabling the use of cheaper gases like nitrogen or cleaned pressure air. The duration and temperature can be adapted to the requirements of other process steps, since short and hot conditions result in the same efficiencies as cool and long ones. Furthermore the standard LFC process was adapted to the use of thicker aluminum layers as well as aluminum/silver stack layer systems. Pure aluminum does not enhance the LFC quality but enables lower conduction losses, the stack system is necessary for standard soldering processes for module integration. Both layers can be used with no loss in solar cell performance

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!