
Most forms of text contain typos and many algorithms have been proposed to find them, but not much attention has been paid to understanding the occurrence of typos and their indirect significance in understanding how humans interact through text. In this paper we propose some ways in which typos can be exploited to reveal details about human interaction and closeness. We also look at how they can be used to improve automatic document classification into formal and informal types.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
