
Linear discrimination analysis (LDA) technique is an important and well-developed area of image recognition and to date many linear discrimination methods have been put forward. Despite these efforts, there persist in LDA at least three areas of weakness. The first weakness is that not all the discrimination vectors that are obtained are useful in pattern classification. Second, it remains computationally expensive to make the discrimination vectors completely satisfy statistical uncorrelation. The third weakness is that it is necessary to select the appropriate principal components. In this paper, we propose to improve discrimination technique in these three areas and to that end present an improved LDA (ILDA) approach which synthesizes these improvements. Experimental results on different image databases demonstrate that our improvements on LDA are efficient, and that ILDA outperforms other state-of-the-art linear discrimination methods.
Discrimination vectors selection, Principal components selection, Discriminant Analysis, Image recognition, Hand, Fisherface method, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Improved linear discrimination analysis (ILDA) approach, Statistical uncorrelation, Artificial Intelligence, Face, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Linear Models, Humans, Dermatoglyphics, Algorithms
Discrimination vectors selection, Principal components selection, Discriminant Analysis, Image recognition, Hand, Fisherface method, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Improved linear discrimination analysis (ILDA) approach, Statistical uncorrelation, Artificial Intelligence, Face, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Linear Models, Humans, Dermatoglyphics, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 47 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
