
In a multirobot system, using shared symbols for objects in the environment is a prerequisite for collaboration. Sharing symbols requires that each agent has anchored a symbol with an internal, sensor level representation, as well as that these symbols match between the agents. The problem can be solved easily when the internal representations can be communicated between the agents. However, with heterogeneous embodiments the available sensors are likely to differ, making it impossible to share the internal representations directly. We propose the use of pointing gestures to align symbols between a heterogeneous group of robots. We describe a planning framework that minimizes the required effort for anchoring representations across robots. The framework allows planning for both the gesturing and observing agents in a decentralized fashion. It considers both implicit sources of failure, such as ambiguous pointing, as well as costs required by actions. Simulation experiments demonstrate that the resulting planning problem has a complex solution structure with multiple local minima. Demonstration with a heterogeneous two-robot system shows the practical viability of this approach.
ta113, Technology, Science & Technology, multi-robot systems, Tracking, [INFO.INFO-RB] Computer Science [cs]/Robotics [cs.RO], RECOGNITION, Robotics, Cognitive robotics, Robot kinematics, Planning, [INFO.INFO-CV] Computer Science [cs]/Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition [cs.CV], POINTING GESTURES, Robot sensing systems, Multi-robot systems, Symbol grounding, symbol grounding, Grounding
ta113, Technology, Science & Technology, multi-robot systems, Tracking, [INFO.INFO-RB] Computer Science [cs]/Robotics [cs.RO], RECOGNITION, Robotics, Cognitive robotics, Robot kinematics, Planning, [INFO.INFO-CV] Computer Science [cs]/Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition [cs.CV], POINTING GESTURES, Robot sensing systems, Multi-robot systems, Symbol grounding, symbol grounding, Grounding
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
