
We consider the problem of error control in a coded, multicast network, focusing on the scenario where the errors can occur only on a proper subset of the network edges. We model this problem via an adversarial noise, presenting a formal framework and a series of techniques to obtain upper and lower bounds on the network's (1-shot) capacity, improving on the best currently known results. In particular, we show that traditional cut-set bounds are not tight in general in the presence of a restricted adversary, and that the non-tightness of these is caused precisely by the restrictions imposed on the noise (and not, as one may expect, by the alphabet size). We also show that, in sharp contrast with the typical situation within network coding, capacity cannot be achieved in general by combining linear network coding with end-to-end channel coding, not even when the underlying network has a single source and a single terminal. We finally illustrate how network decoding techniques are necessary to achieve capacity in the scenarios we examine, exhibiting capacity-achieving schemes and lower bounds for various classes of networks.
Diamonds, double-cut-set bound, Decoding, Computer Science - Information Theory, restricted adversary, Terminology, Symbols, Codes, Network coding, adversarial network, Mathematics - Combinatorics, one-shot capacity, Upper bound
Diamonds, double-cut-set bound, Decoding, Computer Science - Information Theory, restricted adversary, Terminology, Symbols, Codes, Network coding, adversarial network, Mathematics - Combinatorics, one-shot capacity, Upper bound
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
