
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>handle: 11379/28559
In this paper we propose a revisitation of the topic of unique decodability and of some fundamental theorems of lossless coding. It is widely believed that, for any discrete source X, every "uniquely decodable" block code satisfies E[l(X_1 X_2 ... X_n)]>= H(X_1,X_2,...,X_n), where X_1, X_2,...,X_n are the first n symbols of the source, E[l(X_1 X_2 ... X_n)] is the expected length of the code for those symbols and H(X_1,X_2,...,X_n) is their joint entropy. We show that, for certain sources with memory, the above inequality only holds when a limiting definition of "uniquely decodable code" is considered. In particular, the above inequality is usually assumed to hold for any "practical code" due to a debatable application of McMillan's theorem to sources with memory. We thus propose a clarification of the topic, also providing an extended version of McMillan's theorem to be used for Markovian sources.
Accepted for publication, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Uniquely decodable codes; McMillan inequality; Kraft inequality; expected code length, 94A45, Computer Science - Information Theory, Information Theory (cs.IT), 94A45; 94A29; 94A15, 94A15, 94A29
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Uniquely decodable codes; McMillan inequality; Kraft inequality; expected code length, 94A45, Computer Science - Information Theory, Information Theory (cs.IT), 94A45; 94A29; 94A15, 94A15, 94A29
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
