
pmid: 24951695
This paper proposes an adaptive color-guided autoregressive (AR) model for high quality depth recovery from low quality measurements captured by depth cameras. We observe and verify that the AR model tightly fits depth maps of generic scenes. The depth recovery task is formulated into a minimization of AR prediction errors subject to measurement consistency. The AR predictor for each pixel is constructed according to both the local correlation in the initial depth map and the nonlocal similarity in the accompanied high quality color image. We analyze the stability of our method from a linear system point of view, and design a parameter adaptation scheme to achieve stable and accurate depth recovery. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation compared with ten state-of-the-art schemes show the effectiveness and superiority of our method. Being able to handle various types of depth degradations, the proposed method is versatile for mainstream depth sensors, time-of-flight camera, and Kinect, as demonstrated by experiments on real systems.
Color, Reproducibility of Results, Image Enhancement, Sensitivity and Specificity, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Artificial Intelligence, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Photography, Regression Analysis, Colorimetry, Image processing (compression, reconstruction, etc.) in information and communication theory, Algorithms
Color, Reproducibility of Results, Image Enhancement, Sensitivity and Specificity, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Artificial Intelligence, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Photography, Regression Analysis, Colorimetry, Image processing (compression, reconstruction, etc.) in information and communication theory, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 248 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
