
In sinusoidal eddy current nondestructive testing (NDT) of thick ferromagnetic tubes, wall thickness is measured with the coils displaced for 2-3 tube diameters (remote field eddy current technique). The tube inner diameter is measured at higher frequency with another pair of coils displaced for around 1 tube diameter (electrical caliper). In this paper we give a thorough analysis of the excitation frequency and the distance between the coils for measurement of the tube inner diameter and wall thickness as a background for the application of pulsed eddy current (PEC). We propose application of one pair of coils displaced for 1-2 tube diameters for measurement of those tube parameters employing the features of response to the pulsed excitation. Results of our experimental work confirm that PEC technique provides a significant improvement of present eddy current systems for NDT of the ferromagnetic tubes.
Ferromagnetic tubes, pulsed eddy currents; ferromagnetic tube; nondestructive testing, pulse measurements, Ferromagnetic tubes; nondestructive testing (NDT); pulse measurements; pulsed eddy-current (PEC) testing; remote-field eddy current; wall thickness and inner diameter measurement, wall thickness and inner diameter measurement, nondestructive testing (NDT), remote-field eddy current, pulsed eddy-current (PEC) testing
Ferromagnetic tubes, pulsed eddy currents; ferromagnetic tube; nondestructive testing, pulse measurements, Ferromagnetic tubes; nondestructive testing (NDT); pulse measurements; pulsed eddy-current (PEC) testing; remote-field eddy current; wall thickness and inner diameter measurement, wall thickness and inner diameter measurement, nondestructive testing (NDT), remote-field eddy current, pulsed eddy-current (PEC) testing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 104 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
