
This paper investigates some novel modular consequent pole PM machines (CPMs) with E-core and C-core stators. Different slot-pole number combinations including 12-slot/10-pole (Ns>2p) and 12-slot/14-pole (Ns<2p) have been investigated. Their static and dynamic electromagnetic performances have been compared, e.g. the phase back-EMF, on-load torque, torque-speed curves, power factor-speed curves and also efficiency maps are compared. It is found that the existence of flux gaps (FGs) can improve the average torque of the 12-slot/14-pole E-core modular CPMs while the C-core structure can be a better candidate where relatively low torque ripple is desirable. Moreover, by selecting proper FG width, the 12-slot/14-pole E-core modular CPMs can achieve better flux-weakening capability and higher efficiency while the 12-slot/10-pole C-core modular CPMs can have higher power factors over the whole speed range. The finite element simulation results have been validated by a series of experiments using 12-slot/14-pole modular CPMs with both C-core and E-core stators.
C-core, modular, Consequent-pole, permanent magnet machines, E-core
C-core, modular, Consequent-pole, permanent magnet machines, E-core
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
