
In this paper we outline two basic methods for automated theorem proving in nonclassical logics, including modal, many-valued, relevance, and intuitionistic logics. We discuss advantages and disadvantages of each method and give several illustrative examples. We outline a procedure for attacking more complex problems using a combination of the two basic methods. Results of experimental applications of the techniques are reported.
Many-valued logic, Modal logic (including the logic of norms), Intermediate logics, Theorem proving (deduction, resolution, etc.)
Many-valued logic, Modal logic (including the logic of norms), Intermediate logics, Theorem proving (deduction, resolution, etc.)
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 31 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
