
A major cause for a lack in acceptance of today's interdisciplinary modeling approaches is the immense difference in abstraction between engineers' mental models and the available systems modeling languages [1]. Especially mechanical engineers, who use graphical representations like sketches and 3D CAD models, struggle with so called “graphical modeling languages” such as SysML [1][2]. These models represented by two-dimensional diagrams made out of boxes and lines, are not able to display real embodiment aspects and thus do not match with (mechanical) engineers mental models of systems [1].
ddc:620, Engineering & allied operations, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/620, 620
ddc:620, Engineering & allied operations, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/620, 620
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
