
State-of-the-art pedestrian detectors are capable of finding humans in images with reasonable accuracy. However, accurate object detectors such as Integral Channel Features (ICF) do not provide good reliability; they are unable to identify detections which they are less confident (or more uncertain) about. We apply existing methods for generating probabilistic measures from classifier scores (such as Piatt exponential scaling and Isotonic Regression) and compare these to Gaussian Process classifiers (GPCs), which can provide more informative predictive variance. GPCs are less accurate than ICF classifiers, but GPCs and Adaboost with Piatt scaling both provide improved reliability over existing methods.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
