<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
According to Osgood's “Semantic Differential” theory, the connotative meaning of most adjectives can be rated on a scale, the ends of which are antonymic adjectives. Such a pair of antonymic adjectives is called a factor. Osgood and his colleagues found that most of the variance in the text affecting judgment was explained by only three major factors: the evaluative factor (e.g., good-bad), the potency factor (e.g., strong-weak), and the activity factor (e.g., active-passive). The method described in this article defines an ontology-supported topological calculus over the senses of the words and takes into account all categories of content words (not only adjectives). Each set of synonyms is associated with a new mark-up which generalizes the usual subjectivity annotation (positive, negative, and objective) according to a user-based multi-criteria differential semantics model.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |