
The demand for low-power embedded systems requires designers to tune processor parameters to avoid excessive energy wastage. Tuning on a per-application or per-application-phase basis allows a greater saving in energy consumption without a noticeable degradation in performance. On-chip caches often consume a significant fraction of the total energy budget and are therefore prime candidates for adaptation. Fixed-configuration caches must be designed to deliver low average memory access times across a wide range of potential applications. However, this can lead to excessive energy consumption for applications that do not require the full capacity or associativity of the cache at all times. Furthermore, in systems where the clock period is constrained by the access times of level-1 caches, the clock frequency for all applications is effectively limited by the cache requirements of the most demanding phase within the most demanding application. This results in both performance and energy efficiency that represents the lowest common denominator across the applications. In this paper we present a Set and way Management cache Architecture for Run-Time reconfiguration (Smart cache), a cache architecture that allows reconfiguration in both its size and associativity. Results show the energy-delay of the Smart cache is on average 14% better than state-of-the-art cache reconfiguration architectures. We then leverage the flexibility provided by our cache to dynamically reconfigure the hierarchy as a program runs. We develop a decision tree based machine learning model to control the adaptation and automatically reconfigure the cache to the best configuration. Results show an average reduction in energy-delay product of 17% in the data cache (just 1% away from an oracle result) and 34% in the level-2 cache (just 5% away from an oracle), with an overall performance degradation of less than 2% compared with a baseline statically-configured cache.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 25 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
