
In reliability engineering, it is known that electrical and mechanical equipment usually have more than one failure mode or cause. The mixed Weibull distribution is an appropriate distribution to use in modeling the lifetimes of the units that have more than one failure cause. However, due to the lack of a systematic statistical procedure for fitting an appropriate distribution to such a mixed data set, it has not been widely used. A mixed Weibull distribution represents a population that consists of several Weibull subpopulations. In this paper, a new approach is developed to estimate the mixed-Weibull distribution's parameters. At first, the population sample data are split into subpopulation data sets over the whole test duration by using the posterior belonging probability of each observation to each subpopulation. Then, with the new concepts of fracture failure and mean order number, the proposed approach combines the least-squares method with Bayes' theorem, takes advantage of the parameter estimation for single Weibull distribution to each derived subgroup data set, and estimates the parameters of each subpopulation. The proposed approach can also be applied for complete, censored, and grouped data samples. Its superiority is particularly significant when the sample size is relatively small and for the case in which the subpopulations are well mixed. A numerical example is given to compare the proposed method with the conventional plotting method of subpopulation separation. It turns out that the proposed method yields more accurate parameter estimates.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
