Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Plasma Tubes Intercept Micorwave Radiation Independent of Polarization

Authors: Igor Alexeff; Ted Anderson; Esmaeil Farshi; Naresh Karnam; Eric Pius Pradeep; Nanditha Reddy Pulsani;

Plasma Tubes Intercept Micorwave Radiation Independent of Polarization

Abstract

Summary form only given. We have been designing a plasma shield intended to protect sensitive microwave equipment from intense electronic warfare signals. A layer of plasma tubes is used as a microwave reflector. The plasma tubes work extremely well in intercepting microwave radiation when the incident wave electric field is parallel to the tubes. However, if the electric field is perpendicular to the tubes, the normally induced plasma current cannot flow, and the plasma effects are not expected to appear. To our surprise, when the plasma tubes were experimentally tested with the electric field perpendicular to the tubes, the plasma tubes not only intercepted the microwave signal, but the observed cut-off with a pulsed plasma lasted about twice as long. The effect appears to be due to an electrostatic resonance, and preliminary calculations suggest that a normally ignored term in Maxwell's equations is responsible. nabla2E - nabla(nablaldrE) = mu0epsiv0(omegap 2 + part2E/partt2). The term responsible appears to be nabla(nablaldrE).The frequencies involved are in the range of 2.5 GHz. The plasma tubes used are conventional fluorescent lamps. In any event, regardless of the theory, the experimental results demonstrate that shielding a sensitive receiving antenna by a layer of parallel plasma tubes is considerably more effective than had been expected.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!