
handle: 11583/2519115
High-accuracy Total Electron Content (TEC) measurements are important for several applications, including GNSS time transfer with accuracies better than 10 ns. In addition, it is important to provide uncertainty estimates to algorithms that use the TEC measurements. Dual-frequency TEC errors are dominated by satellite inter-frequency biases, satellite inter-code biases, receiver inter-frequency biases, receiver noise and multipath, higher-order ionospheric errors, and receiver inter-code biases for certain receivers. To evaluate different algorithms and error mitigation methods, data were collected from four different GPS receivers in two locations at the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico. Error mitigation methods include receiver hardware bias calibration, comparison with TEC maps provided by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), receiver comparisons, TEC calibration during low TEC count as determined by the Arecibo radar, and multipath mitigation using the Code Noise Multi-Path (CNMP) algorithm [12]. The CNMP algorithm enables the definition of rigorous multipath error bounds on the TEC bias estimation.
Global Navigation Satellite System; Ionosphere; Multipath; Total Electron Content; Global Positioning System; Arecibo Observatory; dual-frequency TEC errors; receiver inter-frequency biases; Calibration; receiver inter-code biases; satellite inter-code biases; satellite inter-frequency biases; high-accuracy total electron content; uncertainty estimate
Global Navigation Satellite System; Ionosphere; Multipath; Total Electron Content; Global Positioning System; Arecibo Observatory; dual-frequency TEC errors; receiver inter-frequency biases; Calibration; receiver inter-code biases; satellite inter-code biases; satellite inter-frequency biases; high-accuracy total electron content; uncertainty estimate
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
