
Subsequent to the launch of an ocean scatterometer onboard the Oceansat-2 satellite, hereby referred to as OSCAT, on September 23, 2009, the nine-month period from November 2009 to July 2010 was the validation phase for the retrieved ocean surface winds. This letter focuses on one section of the validation campaign, where the validation study for OSCAT winds with European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) analyses is carried out. It is found that, in the 4-24-m/s range of wind speed, the rms error in OSCAT wind speed with ECMWF analysis is 1.4 m/s while that with NCEP analysis is 1.7 m/s. In the case of retrieved wind direction, the rms error is 17.2° with ECMWF analyses, while that for NCEP is 18.8°. These statistics are well within the mission goal of 2-m/s accuracy in wind speed and 20 ° in wind directions. This letter discusses the comparison results for different geographical regions and wind speed ranges.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
