Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Intercomparison of OSCAT Winds With Numerical-Model-Generated Winds

Authors: Abhisek Chakraborty; Sanjib K. Deb; Rajesh Shikakolli; Bhawani S. Gohil; Raj Kumar;

Intercomparison of OSCAT Winds With Numerical-Model-Generated Winds

Abstract

Subsequent to the launch of an ocean scatterometer onboard the Oceansat-2 satellite, hereby referred to as OSCAT, on September 23, 2009, the nine-month period from November 2009 to July 2010 was the validation phase for the retrieved ocean surface winds. This letter focuses on one section of the validation campaign, where the validation study for OSCAT winds with European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) analyses is carried out. It is found that, in the 4-24-m/s range of wind speed, the rms error in OSCAT wind speed with ECMWF analysis is 1.4 m/s while that with NCEP analysis is 1.7 m/s. In the case of retrieved wind direction, the rms error is 17.2° with ECMWF analyses, while that for NCEP is 18.8°. These statistics are well within the mission goal of 2-m/s accuracy in wind speed and 20 ° in wind directions. This letter discusses the comparison results for different geographical regions and wind speed ranges.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!