
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>This letter considers a network comprising a transmitter, which employs random linear network coding to encode a message, a legitimate receiver, which can recover the message if it gathers a sufficient number of linearly independent coded packets, and an eavesdropper. Closed-form expressions for the probability of the eavesdropper intercepting enough coded packets to recover the message are derived. Transmission with and without feedback is studied. Furthermore, an optimization model that minimizes the intercept probability under delay and reliability constraints is presented. Results validate the proposed analysis and quantify the secrecy gain offered by a feedback link from the legitimate receiver.
IEEE Communications Letters, to appear
Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI), FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Cryptography and Security, Computer Science - Performance, 330, fountain coding, Computer Science - Information Theory, Information Theory (cs.IT), physical layer security, 004, Computer Science - Networking and Internet Architecture, Performance (cs.PF), Network coding, intercept probability, Cryptography and Security (cs.CR), secrecy outage probability
Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI), FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Cryptography and Security, Computer Science - Performance, 330, fountain coding, Computer Science - Information Theory, Information Theory (cs.IT), physical layer security, 004, Computer Science - Networking and Internet Architecture, Performance (cs.PF), Network coding, intercept probability, Cryptography and Security (cs.CR), secrecy outage probability
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
