
doi: 10.1109/icgi.2017.47
In job-centric monitoring, monitors gather series of measurements, e.g., the used CPU load, per job. In domains where jobs are expected to behave similar, job-centric monitoring allows detecting misbehaving jobs based on a reference series of measurements. However, current detection approaches neglect time-drifts in series, e.g., caused by different CPU speeds and therefore potentially cause false positives.To cope with this issue, this paper introduces a novel approach to compensate such time-drifts. Our approach is based on a transformation that aligns a series of measurements to the reference series time. In a proof-of-concept with synthetic job-centric monitoring data, we show that our approach reduces the number of false positives significant.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
