
Image quality measures should show how some new interpolation method performs in comparison with other interpolation methods. For the case of magnified image achieved by interpolation, original image is unknown and there is no perfect way to judge the magnification quality. Common approach is to start with an original image, generate a lower resolution version of original image, and then use different interpolation methods to magnify low resolution image. After that original and magnified images are compared to evaluate difference between them. In this paper we examine how the process of achieving lower resolution image affects picture quality of interpolated images. Our results show that comparison of image interpolation methods depends on downscaling technique, image contents and quality metric. For fair comparison all these parametres need to be considered. Otherwise, results of comparison can be incorrect.
Image Interpolation; Picture Quality Assessment; Image Resizing, Picture Quality Assessment, Image Interpolation, Image Resizing
Image Interpolation; Picture Quality Assessment; Image Resizing, Picture Quality Assessment, Image Interpolation, Image Resizing
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
