Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Enabling Effective Module-Oblivious Power Gating for Embedded Processors

Authors: Hari Cherupalli; Henry Duwe; Weidong Ye; Rakesh Kumar 0002; John Sartori;

Enabling Effective Module-Oblivious Power Gating for Embedded Processors

Abstract

The increasingly-stringent power and energy requirements of emerging embedded applications have led to a strong recent interest in aggressive power gating techniques. Conventional techniques for aggressive power gating perform module-based power gating in processors, where power domains correspond to RTL modules. We observe that there can be significant power benefits from module-oblivious power gating, where power domains can include an arbitrary set of gates, possibly from multiple RTL modules. However, since it is not possible to infer the activity of module-oblivious power domains from software alone, conventional software-based power management techniques cannot be applied for module-oblivious power gating in processors. Also, since module-oblivious domains are not encapsulated with a well-defined port list and functionality like RTL modules, hardware-based management of module-oblivious domains is prohibitively expensive. In this paper, we present a technique for low-cost management of module-oblivious power domains in embedded processors. The technique involves symbolic simulation-based co-analysis of a processor's hardware design and a software binary to derive profitable and safe power gating decisions for a given set of module-oblivious domains when the software binary is run on the processor. Our technique is automated, does not require programmer intervention, and incurs low management overhead. We demonstrate that module-oblivious power gating based on our technique reduces leakage energy by 2x with respect to state-of-the-art aggressive module-based power gating for a common embedded processor.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!