
doi: 10.1109/hpca.2017.48
The increasingly-stringent power and energy requirements of emerging embedded applications have led to a strong recent interest in aggressive power gating techniques. Conventional techniques for aggressive power gating perform module-based power gating in processors, where power domains correspond to RTL modules. We observe that there can be significant power benefits from module-oblivious power gating, where power domains can include an arbitrary set of gates, possibly from multiple RTL modules. However, since it is not possible to infer the activity of module-oblivious power domains from software alone, conventional software-based power management techniques cannot be applied for module-oblivious power gating in processors. Also, since module-oblivious domains are not encapsulated with a well-defined port list and functionality like RTL modules, hardware-based management of module-oblivious domains is prohibitively expensive. In this paper, we present a technique for low-cost management of module-oblivious power domains in embedded processors. The technique involves symbolic simulation-based co-analysis of a processor's hardware design and a software binary to derive profitable and safe power gating decisions for a given set of module-oblivious domains when the software binary is run on the processor. Our technique is automated, does not require programmer intervention, and incurs low management overhead. We demonstrate that module-oblivious power gating based on our technique reduces leakage energy by 2x with respect to state-of-the-art aggressive module-based power gating for a common embedded processor.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
