
handle: 2086/932
The shapes of terms used in fuzzy systems have adopted several 'conventions'. Terms are almost invariably normalised (having a maximum membership value of 1), convex (having a single maximum or plateau maxima) and distinct (being restricted in their degree of overlap: often expressed as some variation on the concept that all membership values at any point in the universe of discourse sum to I across that universe). The shape of these terms are generated by certain accepted membership functions: piecewise linear functions (with restrictions), Gaussians or Sigmoids are almost exclusively used. As such these constitute only a small subset of the total set of possible shapes of terms. These conventions are largely empirical or are justified by arguments based on what might loosely be called 'fuzzy control principles'. The paper highlights a number of membership functions that developers of fuzzy systems outside the paradigm of fuzzy control may consider as alternatives. In particular, we highlight subsumed fuzzy sets, discuss the merits of non-convex fuzzy sets and present a medical application where sub-normal fuzzy sets have been used. These ideas are reinforced by examples.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 37 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
