
doi: 10.1109/fpl.2010.84
The second round of the NIST-run public competition is underway to find a new hash algorithm(s) for inclusion in the NIST Secure Hash Standard (SHA-3). This paper presents the full implementations of all of the second round candidates in hardware with all of their variants. In order to determine their computational efficiency, an important aspect in NIST's round two evaluation criteria, this paper gives an area/speed comparison of each design both with and without a hardware interface, thereby giving an overall impression of their performance in resource constrained and resource abundant environments. The implementation results are provided for a Virtex-5 FPGA device. The efficiency of the architectures for the hash functions are compared in terms of throughput per unit area.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 62 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
