
arXiv: 1608.06016
handle: 1721.1/111684 , 1721.1/113573
We present an $\tilde{O}\left(m^{\frac{10}{7}}U^{\frac{1}{7}}\right)$-time algorithm for the maximum $s$-$t$ flow problem and the minimum $s$-$t$ cut problem in directed graphs with $m$ arcs and largest integer capacity $U$. This matches the running time of the $\tilde{O}\left((mU)^{\frac{10}{7}}\right)$-time algorithm of Mądry (FOCS 2013) in the unit-capacity case, and improves over it, as well as over the $\tilde{O}\left(m \sqrt{n} \log U\right)$-time algorithm of Lee and Sidford (FOCS 2014), whenever $U$ is moderately large and the graph is sufficiently sparse. By well-known reductions, this also gives similar running time improvements for the maximum-cardinality bipartite $b$-matching problem. One of the advantages of our algorithm is that it is significantly simpler than the ones presented in Madry (FOCS 2013) and Lee and Sidford (FOCS 2014). In particular, these algorithms employ a sophisticated interior-point method framework, while our algorithm is cast directly in the classic augmenting path setting that almost all the combinatorial maximum flow algorithms use. At a high level, the presented algorithm takes a primal dual approach in which each iteration uses electrical flows computations both to find an augmenting $s$-$t$ flow in the current residual graph and to update the dual solution. We show that by maintain certain careful coupling of these primal and dual solutions we are always guaranteed to make significant progress.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms, Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms, Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 61 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
