
In this paper, two approaches to calculating Capacity Factor of fixed speed wind turbines are reviewed and then compared using a case study. The quasi-exact approach utilizes discrete wind raw data (in the histogram form) and manufacturer provided turbine power curve (also in discrete form) to numerically calculate the capacity factor. On the other hand, the approximate approach employs a continuous probability distribution function, fitted to the wind data as well as continuous turbine power curve, resulting from double-polynomial fitting of manufacturer-provided power curve data. The latter approach, while being an approximation, can be solved analytically thus providing a valuable insight into the factors, affecting the Capacity Factor. Moreover, several other merits of wind turbine performance are based on the analytically derived equations and hence are an approximation as well. The note shows that the results obtained by employing both approaches are very close, thus the analytically derived approximations are valid and may be used for wind turbine performance evaluation.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
