
This paper compares the ground potential rise (GPR) from lightning overvoltage with two different grounding methods, no bonding and bonding of grounding systems, between the communication tower and main ground bar (MGB) of the TOT communication station. Direct lightning stroke to the communication tower gives the higher overvoltage than the lightning stroke on distribution overhead line and also higher than the induced voltage surge. The ground bonding gives the less lightning overvoltage when compared with no ground bonding so the ground bonding in communication station is recommended. To reduce the damage from lightning overvoltage occur to the protecting equipments especially for data transmission interface (DTI), the protectors should have a higher energy discharge capability.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
