
doi: 10.1109/cvmp.2010.14
For motion-adaptive video retiming methods, the quest to lower the implementation complexity and improve the quality of motion estimation algorithms still continues. Comparing different motion estimators (MEs) and/or fine-tuning ME parameters is a time-consuming task, and it is even more demanding to identify the MEs with a robust performance among all the well-performing MEs. Therefore, a computer-aided design methodology is required to effectively explore the large design space. Such a methodology requires objective performance metrics. As it is hard to find perfect metrics, we present a design methodology that can use suboptimal measures and still identify robust MEs. The proposed methodology is demonstrated using two different MEs.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
