
There exist well known algorithms for estimating either a transfer function or a state-space description corresponding to a given noise-free impulse response. When the data consists of impulse response plus noise, the algorithms have to be modified in order to give good performance. In both the transfer function and state-space approaches, the key modification involves the use of the singular value decomposition (SVD). However, there are fundamental differences in the way in which the SVD is used to improve performances in the noisy data case. IN this paper, the differences between the two approaches are studied, as well as the corresponding performance of each method.
620
620
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
