
Gait recognition on smartphones could be considered as one of the most user-friendly biometric modalities. The main benefit of gait recognition is that it is an unobtrusive biometric modality, since it requires little interaction with the user. Users would only have to carry the sensor device and walk as normally. Its unobtrusiveness make it suitable for a user-friendly access system. Up to date, most studies on gait recognition have been done using dedicated hardware acquisition sensors. Nevertheless, one possible solution for gait recognition is using sensors embedded on smartphones. This paper compares the performance of four state-of-art algorithms on a smartphone. These algorithms have already been tested on dedicated hardware but not in a commercial phone. For such purpose, a database using a smartphone as acquisition device has been obtained. State-of-art gait recognition algorithms have been tested on this data base, as well as a new cycle detection algorithm which has been designed to have the same starting point. As a result, the algorithms have shown EER ranging from 16.38% to 29.07%, These EERs are significantly higher than the ones obtained in dedicated hardware which ranged from 5.7% to 13%.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
