
arXiv: 1911.06217
Road networks are a type of spatial network, where edges may be associated with qualitative information such as road type and speed limit. Unfortunately, such information is often incomplete; for instance, OpenStreetMap only has speed limits for 13% of all Danish road segments. This is problematic for analysis tasks that rely on such information for machine learning. To enable machine learning in such circumstances, one may consider the application of network embedding methods to extract structural information from the network. However, these methods have so far mostly been used in the context of social networks, which differ significantly from road networks in terms of, e.g., node degree and level of homophily (which are key to the performance of many network embedding methods). We analyze the use of network embedding methods, specifically node2vec, for learning road segment embeddings in road networks. Due to the often limited availability of information on other relevant road characteristics, the analysis focuses on leveraging the spatial network structure. Our results suggest that network embedding methods can indeed be used for deriving relevant network features (that may, e.g, be used for predicting speed limits), but that the qualities of the embeddings differ from embeddings for social networks.
Best Paper at the 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Big Spatial Data (BSD 2018)
feature learning, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, machine learning, Computer Science - Databases, Statistics - Machine Learning, network embedding, Databases (cs.DB), Machine Learning (stat.ML), road network, Machine Learning (cs.LG)
feature learning, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, machine learning, Computer Science - Databases, Statistics - Machine Learning, network embedding, Databases (cs.DB), Machine Learning (stat.ML), road network, Machine Learning (cs.LG)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
