Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Toward improved landing precision on Mars

Authors: Aron A. Wolf; Yang Cheng; John M. Carson; Jordi Casoliva; Mark C. Ivanov; Behcet Acikmese;

Toward improved landing precision on Mars

Abstract

Mars landers to date have flown ballistic entry trajectories with no trajectory control after the final maneuver before entry. 12Improvements in landing accuracies (from ∼150 km from the target for Mars Pathfinder to ∼30–40 km for MER and Phoenix) have been driven by approach navigation improvements. MSL will fly the first guided-entry trajectory to Mars, further improving accuracy to ∼10–12 km from the target. For future missions, landing within ∼100m is desired to assure landing safety close to a target of high scientific interest in irregular terrain, or to land near a previously landed asset. Improvements in approach navigation alone are not sufficient to achieve this requirement. If approach navigation error and IMU error are eliminated, the dominant error source is wind drift on the parachute, with map-tie error also significant. Correcting these errors requires terrain-relative navigation (TRN), which can be accomplished with passive imaging supplemented by radar for terrain sensing (with onboard navigation capable of processing measurements from IMU, imaging, and radar). Additionally, near-optimal-ΔV powered descent guidance is needed to minimize the amount of propellant required to reach the target. The capability to land within 100m can be applied in different landing modes depending on how much fuel is carried.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    21
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
21
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?