
doi: 10.1109/acsd.2011.19
Experience in business process analysis shows that operational processes often do not conform to process models. Although classical conformance checking techniques can identify deviations of process executions from predefined models, they may produce inaccurate results due to strong assumptions. In this paper, we present a robust conformance checking technique based on Petri net techniques allowing us to lift assumptions and to take into account the cost of deviating from given models.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 41 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
