
doi: 10.1109/52.854069
handle: 11583/1403072
Examines the impact of software process diversity in one specific area: software reuse, which means that the work products developed elsewhere (in another project, group or company) are used again. To learn how to achieve reuse, we initiated a two-year study in 1997 of roughly two dozen European companies that were establishing reuse programmes in the context of process improvement experiments. We discovered that, despite diversity in business context, technical and managerial traditions and company size, companies can indeed achieve reuse, using diverse processes. From that study, we present four companies (Sodalia, Thomson-CSF, Eliop and Chase Information Technology Services) as case histories, selected for the variety and effectiveness of their approaches. These four European companies successfully achieved software reuse despite pursuing radically different processes and technologies. The authors explore the reasons behind the companies' success and present guidelines for others wanting to establish reuse programmes.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
