
doi: 10.1108/eb046538
The effective management of shareholder communications requires a close understanding of both the formal and informal components of companies' relationships with their major shareholders. The ownership of listed companies is very concentrated and typically the ten largest investors control around one‐third of their shares. Although these shareholders are also those most likely to vote, their greatest influence on companies is through their direct relationships and private meetings with key members of the board. These are a key component of corporate governance, but are not consistently effective in dealing with under‐performing companies, nor are investors outside the top ten or 20 fund managers in the UK often involved. Companies and investors need to balance the apparent efficiency of these relationships with their impact on corporate performance. Limited transparency leads to reduced accountability, both of which need to be addressed in the planning and implementation of companies' communications programmes if long‐term shareholder value is to be maximized.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
