
doi: 10.1108/eb027002
In a recent US study, Lev and Zarowin (1999) documented a steady decline in the value relevance of financial statements over a twenty year period. They attribute this decline, in part, to the inadequate financial reporting of intangibles, and particularly US accounting requirements for the immediate expensing of these items. In contrast to US accounting standards, capitalization of R&D expenditure is permitted in Australia under Approved Australian Accounting Standard AASB 1011 “Accounting for Research and Development Costs.” As expected, the capitalization of intangibles was found to be significantly higher in the new economy sector, with an increasing trend towards capitalization over the past five years. The results are broadly consistent with the US study. However, while not unequivocal, the results also suggest that the earnings‐return relationship was steadier, and the cash flow‐return relationship stronger overall in the new economy sector, indicating some tentative support for proponents of capitalization.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
