
Leaf area, chlorophyll content, net CO(2) photoassimilation, and the partitioning of fixed carbon between leaf sucrose and starch and soluble protein were examined in Glycine max (L) Merr. cv Williams grown under three different nitrogen regimes. One group (Nod+/+) was inoculated with Bradyrhizobium and watered daily with a nutrient solution containing 6 millimolar NH(4)NO(3). A second set (Nod+/-) was inoculated and had N(2) fixation as its sole source of nitrogen. A third group (Nod(-)) was not inoculated and was watered daily with a nutrient solution containing 6 millimolar NH(4)NO(3). The mean net micromole CO(2) uptake per square decimeter per hour of the most recently matured source leaves was similar among the three groups of plants, being about 310. Mean leaf area of the source leaves, monitored for net photosynthesis was also similar. However, the mean milligram of chlorophyll per square decimeter of Nod+/- test leaves was about 50% lower than the other groups' leaves and indicated nitrogen deficiency. Thus, Nod+/- utilized their chlorophyll more efficiently for photosynthetic CO(2) uptake than the plants of the other treatments. The ratio of foliar carbohydrate:protein content was high in Nod+/- but low in the plants from the other two treatments. This inverse relationship between foliar protein and carbohydrate content suggests that more fixed carbon is diverted to the synthesis of protein when nitrogen availability is high. It was also found that Nod+/- sequestered more storage protein in their paraveinal mesophyll than plants of the other treatments. This study indicates that when inorganic nitrogen regimes are used to control photosynthate partitioning, then both leaf carbohydrate and leaf protein must be considered as end products of carbon assimilate allocation.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
