
pmid: 17930654
Secure key distribution among two remote parties is impossible when both are classical, unless some unproven (and arguably unrealistic) computation-complexity assumptions are made, such as the difficulty of factorizing large numbers. On the other hand, a secure key distribution is possible when both parties are quantum. What is possible when only one party (Alice) is quantum, yet the other (Bob) has only classical capabilities? We present a protocol with this constraint, and prove its robustness against attacks: we prove that any attempt of an adversary to obtain information (and even a tiny amount of information) necessarily induces some errors that the legitimate users could notice.
4 and a bit pages, 1 figure, RevTeX
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Quantum Physics, Computer Science - Cryptography and Security, FOS: Physical sciences, Quantum Physics (quant-ph), Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Quantum Physics, Computer Science - Cryptography and Security, FOS: Physical sciences, Quantum Physics (quant-ph), Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 304 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
