
Many algorithms to detect communities in networks typically work without any information on the cluster structure to be found, as one has no a priori knowledge of it, in general. Not surprisingly, knowing some features of the unknown partition could help its identification, yielding an improvement of the performance of the method. Here we show that, if the number of clusters were known beforehand, standard methods, like modularity optimization, would considerably gain in accuracy, mitigating the severe resolution bias that undermines the reliability of the results of the original unconstrained version. The number of clusters can be inferred from the spectra of the recently introduced non-backtracking and flow matrices, even in benchmark graphs with realistic community structure. The limit of such two-step procedure is the overhead of the computation of the spectra.
9 pages, 6 figures. Published version
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Physics - Physics and Society, FOS: Physical sciences, Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph), Models, Biological, Animals, Humans, ta318, Computer Simulation, ta116, ta515, ta217, ta113, Social and Information Networks (cs.SI), Models, Statistical, ta114, Computer Science - Social and Information Networks, Algorithms
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Physics - Physics and Society, FOS: Physical sciences, Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph), Models, Biological, Animals, Humans, ta318, Computer Simulation, ta116, ta515, ta217, ta113, Social and Information Networks (cs.SI), Models, Statistical, ta114, Computer Science - Social and Information Networks, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
