
We investigate signatures of neutrino scattering in the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) and matter power spectra, and the extent to which present cosmological data can distinguish between a free streaming or tightly coupled fluid of neutrinos. If neutrinos have strong non-standard interactions, for example, through the coupling of neutrinos to a light boson, they may be kept in equilibrium until late times. We show how the power spectra for these models differ from more conventional neutrino scenarios, and use CMB and large scale structure data to constrain these models. CMB polarization data improves the constraints on the number of massless neutrinos, while the Lyman--$α$ power spectrum improves the limits on the neutrino mass. Neutrino mass limits depend strongly on whether some or all of the neutrino species interact and annihilate. The present data can accommodate a number of tightly-coupled relativistic degrees of freedom, and none of the interacting-neutrino scenarios considered are ruled out by current data -- although considerations regarding the age of the Universe disfavor a model with three annihilating neutrinos with very large neutrino masses.
17 pages, 14 figures, minor changes and references added, published in Phys. Rev. D
radiofrequency cosmic radiation, neutrino interactions, Astrophysics (astro-ph), 500, FOS: Physical sciences, neutrino scattering, Astrophysics, 530, neutrino mass, High Energy Physics - Phenomenology, High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph), cosmology, cosmic ray neutrinos
radiofrequency cosmic radiation, neutrino interactions, Astrophysics (astro-ph), 500, FOS: Physical sciences, neutrino scattering, Astrophysics, 530, neutrino mass, High Energy Physics - Phenomenology, High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph), cosmology, cosmic ray neutrinos
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 93 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
