<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Two distinct energy transfer (ET) mechanisms have been proposed for the conversion of blue to near-infrared (NIR) photons in YAG:Ce3+,Yb3+. The first mechanism involves downconversion by cooperative energy transfer, which would yield two NIR photons for each blue photon excitation. The second mechanism of single-step energy transfer yields only a single NIR photon for each blue photon excitation and has been argued to proceed via a Ce4+-Yb2+ charge transfer state (CTS). If the first mechanism were operative in YAG:Ce3+,Yb3+, this material would have the potential to greatly increase the response of crystalline Si solar cells to the blue/UV part of the solar spectrum. In this work, however, we demonstrate that blue-to-NIR conversion in YAG:Ce3+,Yb3+ goes via the single-step mechanism of ET via a Ce4+-Yb2+ CTS. The photoluminescence decay dynamics of the Ce3+ excited state are inconsistent with Monte Carlo simulations of the cooperative (one-to-two photon) energy transfer, while they are well reproduced by simulations of single-step (one-to-one photon) energy transfer via a charge transfer state. Based on temperature dependent measurements of energy transfer and luminescence quenching we construct a configuration coordinate model for the Ce3+-to-Yb3+ energy transfer, which includes the Ce4+-Yb2+ charge transfer state.
SOLAR-CELLS, INORGANIC-COMPOUNDS, EFFICIENCY, PERFORMANCE, BAND, DOWN-CONVERSION, YB3+, CE3+, DOPED YTTERBIUM OXYORTHOSILICATE, LUMINESCENCE
SOLAR-CELLS, INORGANIC-COMPOUNDS, EFFICIENCY, PERFORMANCE, BAND, DOWN-CONVERSION, YB3+, CE3+, DOPED YTTERBIUM OXYORTHOSILICATE, LUMINESCENCE
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 84 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |