
doi: 10.1101/pdb.ip82
pmid: 21632792
INTRODUCTIONIMGT standardized keywords have been defined for the identification of immunoglobulins (IG) and T cell receptors (TR) and conventional genes. These keywords are based on the concepts of identification, generated from the IDENTIFICATION axiom of the Formal IMGT-ONTOLOGY or IMGT-Kaleidoscope that postulates that any molecule, cell, tissue, organ, organism, or population, any process and any relation, has to be identified. Most of the IMGT standardized keywords used for the identification of sequences and structures are names of IMGT-ONTOLOGY leafconcepts (a leafconcept is a concept that corresponds to the finest level of granularity). IMGT standardized keywords have been essential for the data entries into the IMGT databases and tools, and particularly into IMGT/LIGM-DB, the first and the largest IMGT database that contains IG and TR nucleotide sequences and the translation of annotated sequences. IMGT standardized keywords for IG, TR, and conventional genes are defined in the context of the IMGT-ONTOLOGY concepts of identification.
Biological Products, [SDV.BIBS] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Quantitative Methods [q-bio.QM], Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, Immunoglobulins, [SDV.GEN] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics, Histocompatibility Antigens, Terminology as Topic, Immunogenetics, Animals, Humans, [INFO.INFO-BI] Computer Science [cs]/Bioinformatics [q-bio.QM], Information Systems
Biological Products, [SDV.BIBS] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Quantitative Methods [q-bio.QM], Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, Immunoglobulins, [SDV.GEN] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics, Histocompatibility Antigens, Terminology as Topic, Immunogenetics, Animals, Humans, [INFO.INFO-BI] Computer Science [cs]/Bioinformatics [q-bio.QM], Information Systems
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 34 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
