
doi: 10.1101/gr.9.1.7
pmid: 9927480
Hearing impairment is clinically and genetically heterogeneous. There are >400 disorders in which hearing impairment is a characteristic of the syndrome, and family studies demonstrate that there are at least 30 autosomal loci for nonsyndromic hearing impairment. The genes that have been identified encode diaphanous (HDIA1), α-tectorin (TECTA), the transcription factorPOU4F3, connexin 26 (GJB2), and two unconventional myosins (MYO7A and MYO15), and four novel proteins (PDS,COCH, DFNA5, DFNB9). The same clinical phenotype in hearing-impaired individuals, even those within the same family, can result from mutations in different genes. Conversely, mutations in the same gene can result in a variety of clinical phenotypes with different modes of inheritance. For example, mutations in the gene encoding MYO7A cause Usher syndrome type IB, autosomal-recessive nonsyndromic hearing impairment (DFNB2), and autosomal-dominant nonsyndromic hearing impairment (DFNA11). Additionally, the mouse ortholog of theMYO7A gene is the shaker-1 gene. Mouse models such asshaker-1 have facilitated the identification of genes that cause hearing impairment in humans. The availability of high-resolution maps of the human and mouse genomes and new technologies for gene identification are advancing molecular understanding of hearing impairment and the complex mechanisms of the auditory system.
Genome, Human, History, 19th Century, History, 20th Century, Connexins, Connexin 26, History, 17th Century, Disease Models, Animal, History, 16th Century, Animals, Humans, Hearing Disorders
Genome, Human, History, 19th Century, History, 20th Century, Connexins, Connexin 26, History, 17th Century, Disease Models, Animal, History, 16th Century, Animals, Humans, Hearing Disorders
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 45 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
