
Many ecological studies employ general models that can feature an arbitrary number of populations. A critical requirement imposed on such models is clone consistency : If the individuals from two populations are indistinguishable, joining these populations into one shall not affect the outcome of the model. Otherwise a model produces different outcomes for the same scenario. Using functional analysis, we comprehensively characterize all clone-consistent models: We prove that they are necessarily composed from basic building blocks, namely linear combinations of parameters and abundances. These strong constraints enable a straightforward validation of model consistency or reveal implicit assumptions required to achieve it. We show that such implicit assumptions can considerably limit the applicability of models and the generality of results obtained with them. Moreover, our insights facilitate building new clone-consistent models, which we illustrate for a data-driven model of microbial communities. Finally, our insights point to new relevant forms of general models for theoretical ecology. Our framework thus provides a systematic way of comprehending ecological models, which can guide a wide range of studies.
Population Density, Models, Statistical, Ecology, QH301-705.5, Population Dynamics, Models, Theoretical, Models, Biological, Clone Cells, Treatment Outcome, Predatory Behavior, Animals, Computer Simulation, Biology (General), Algorithms, Ecosystem, Research Article
Population Density, Models, Statistical, Ecology, QH301-705.5, Population Dynamics, Models, Theoretical, Models, Biological, Clone Cells, Treatment Outcome, Predatory Behavior, Animals, Computer Simulation, Biology (General), Algorithms, Ecosystem, Research Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
